About Me

Name: Paco Capella
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Blog Roll

 

renny

I agree with you about the HRC-Obama slogan.

What can we do to counter that?  This:

1.  Make English the official Language, because 85% of the Americans support this and HRC-Obama clan opposes.

2.  Absolute Border Security, socialists want open borders

3.  Small Government => Eliminate the IRS => Eliminate Income Taxes => Replace it with a flat tax (which 80% of Americans favors) or a consumption tax =>  We need a simple tax law not a complicated law saturated with loopholes that stimulates tax avoidance.  => The socialists want to increase taxes, add more loopholes for the rich, to fatten the government and will oppose to a flat tax.

4.  89% of Americans want to have a secret ballot for union representatives before the state of the union, HRC opposes.

5.  Hydrogen Economy => Energy Independence =>   we have great American Solutions on this area, socialist have NOTHING.

6.  We need to Rediscover God in America, the core values of our forefathers, we need to put back "under God" into the Pledge of Allegiance, we need to Reform our Education System to teach the core values of America, US History (as Thomas Jefferson wrote that the chief value of studying the past is "rendering the people the safe, as they are the ultimate, guardians of their own liberty". History by apprising them of the past will enable them to be a judge of the future."), the notion of one People (instead of the globalism & multiculturalism of the liberals).  What socialists offer?  More Folsom St parades, no God, rights for the deviants and freaks, more concessions to the Islamists, Habeas Corpus for the terrorists, GLTB's educating our children.

7.  And I am just going to pause here to give YOU my fellow American the opportunity to point out more issues where we have solutions proven to work and the socialist have ideas proven to fail.

The Bottom Line is that the way to defeat our enemy is NOT by talking crap about our own and beating each other up; not even talking crap about our enemies, BUT INSTEAD talking about solutions the vast majority of Americans agree to that are in contraposition with the socialists platform.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

EO/EEO and CR

EO, EEO and CR
Equal Opportunity, Equal Employment Opportunity, and Civil Rights.

What is that crap about "sexual orientation" and “gender identity”?  Probably what libs, secular progressives, the far-left, socialists, and dems meant to say is "sexual preference", or perhaps “sexual whatever”.

EO/EEO protects individuals from discrimination or abuses due to Age, Gender, Creed/Religion, Partisan Political Affiliation, National Origin, Race, Ethnicity, Marital Status, Handicap (Mental or Physical Disability), and Sexual Harassment.  These (except for sexual harassment) are immutable traits.

Some definitions about preferences.

·         Immutable means inability to be change without exception.
·         A heterosexual is one with a sexual preference for one's opposite sex.
·         A homosexual is one with a sexual preference for one's same sex.
·         A pedophiliac is one with an abnormal sexual preference for children.
·         A necrophiliac is one with [a weird] sexual preference for corpses.
·         A hemophiliac is one with abnormal bleeding control tendency or ability.  Oops ... not related with sex.

Some Suffixes.

·         -philiac – is a suffix meaning [wrong, bad, or negative] tendency or attraction toward something.
·         -phile – is a suffix meaning fondest, loving or attraction toward something.  Examples: Audiophile, Francophile.
·         -philic – is a suffix meaning sick or ill tendency or attraction toward something.

Now, let’s go back to the crap.  How in the world can you include a Civil Right for “gender identity” and/or “sexual preference, attraction, orientation or sexual tendency”?

What is a gender identity?  I thought genders where masculine and feminine in languages or male and female in natural sciences.  I know that a hermaphrodite is one having both male and female sexual organs; and I also know that an androgynous thing is a thing’s characteristic is neither male nor female.  For example there certain names that can be given to both a male or female person such as “Dana”.  In the Army, I knew a male sergeant that hated his first name it was Dana.  I used to have a female co-worker at a Navy Contractor named Dana.  Therefore, Dana is an androgynous name.

This begs the question, is there an androgynous gender identity?  Do we need to define one capriciously?

Equal Opportunity is a broader equality concept because it can be applied to any opportunity for advancement humans may compete in life.  That is probably why late President J.F. Kennedy signed the Affirmative Action executive order almost half a century ago.  In essence, all of the discrimination issues about sex are already included in Gender, Sexual Harassment and to some extent in Marital Status (i.e., single, married, divorced, widowed and separated).

Necessity and Immutability Questions.
Is there a need to define a gender “condition” as ambivalent, neuter, indeterminate, or unknown?  Is the condition physically, psychologically, mentally, genetically identifiable?  Is the prospective “gender identity” an immutable trait deserving to be included among the other immutable traits already in our laws?

English Liberalism.
Do we need to change the words definitions in the American English Language?  No wonder we have so many problems with English.  Other Languages such as Spanish have an academy of language doctors and scholars named Real Academia Española (Spanish Royal Academy) with representative members from all countries where Spanish is used including believe it or not the USA. L'Académie française is the equivalence to the Spanish Royal Academy in France.  In the US, for example, our higher education centers are the ones who capriciously decide what meanings to give to the American English Language words.  There is a huge difference in the dictionaries of 50 years ago, 25 years ago, and 5 years ago.  Do your own research and check how the definitions for sex, gender and marriage have changed in the last 50 years.  If we just had a Royal Academy of the English Language, then we wouldn’t have the present definitions chaos, but we don’t.  We are doomed in this respect.

The Bottom Line.
It will be a big mistake to change the US Code and/or our Constitution to include “gender identity”, sexual attractions, preferences, tendencies, or orientations.  Imagine including “sexual whatever” as a category you cannot discriminate against.  You will have to include not just the heterosexuals, but also the homosexuals, the pedophiliacs, necrophiliacs, and other deviant sexual preferences, tendencies, orientations and attractions.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (8) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Atheists Main Malfunction

It is with great reluctance that I write the following thoughts, because trying to reconcile the disputes between evolutionists, creationists, theists and atheists is an overwhelming task and indeed a wearying endeavor.

This is the main malfunction of those who call themselves Atheists:  Theists’ God existence reasons are insufficient.  Atheists have used inductive, deductive, subjective and empirical arguments against God’s existence proofs. As a person of faith and science by education and experience, I am convinced of the truth of St. Thomas Aquinas’ God existence proof, because of its simplicity.

Look at how transcendental God’s existence is that God becomes a necessity.  Atheists’ experiences and actions to include the act of not believing in God’s existence, is a simplistic proof of God’s existence because God’s existence is a necessary condition for atheists’ intelligibility.

The “first cause” argument does not necessarily imply a supernatural being that put things into movement, the so-called Prime Mover; motion is a notion that is a function of another notion, which is time.  Thermodynamics and Quantum Physics tend to weaken the first cause argument due to probabilities versus causes.  My argumentation about these theories is that they are the best we have epistemologically speaking for their success in explaining most of our discoveries through mathematical models of the perceived reality.  However, they are no absolute, they do not apply everywhere from the sub-atomic phenomena to the super-cosmos as is for example the evident effect of Gravity, nor they are complete and consistent as to effectively use them as counterarguments to the set of qualities and properties of God ontologically speaking.  This is a scientifically recognized duality.  Just by a simple change, manipulation or interpretation of a critical axiom in God’s existence proof can be easily used to disproof God’s existence.  How an intelligent interpretation is made in the first place?  Who is right?

I continue to sustain that our knowledge is limited, is not complete by any stretch of our finite imagination.  "Me believe" that for our knowledge to be complete and consistent means to be God.  Since I only believe in one God, not everybody and the mother that believes to have the entire necessary knowledge to disproof God’s proofs, can be God.  Therefore, the proof of God existence, such as Saint Thomas of Aquinas from the cosmological point of view or such as Descartes, Leibniz, and Gödel from the ontological point of view must be something simple and trivial and they really are.  No wonder unconsciously atheists at a moment of overwhelming crisis fill in the gap with God.  How arrogant … how hypocrite … they can be with THEMSELVES in denying God existence.  No wonder there are some atheists support groups to help them to avoid unconsciously filling the gap with God existence.  Atheists have the audacity to then argue that theists are going around in circles, it is not so, actually theists from all points of views (e.g., theological, ontological, cosmological, you name it: fill the gap with God) have always a very simple approach to God’s existence proof: God exists, an always-true statement.  There is no need to go around in circles.

There is no incentive in solving the existence of everything by being atheist.  Thanks God they are a miniscule minority.  As we find ways to unify all theories into one that is complete and consistent, as close we will get to understand God.  This is an unconscious long-term goal of humankind.  The conscious short-term goal is be to become a virtuous of the Theological Virtues, which is an impossibility for atheists.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (5) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Why do students need to learn Spanish?

This is my answer to Josue from Annandale, VA on his article: “Why do students need to learn Spanish?

Why Frenchmen learn Spanish, German and English?  Why Europeans are fluent in more than two languages?

Why are we treated so rude when we go to other countries and do not even try to learn a few words of the host country spoken language?

Why that incident occurred in that Parochial Catholic Church School?

The most logical answer is to become better communicators that would definitively lead us to get in closer contact with people we often fear or prejudge.

A long time ago, Father Tadeusz Mich, PhD in Anthropology,  a Polish from Poland, a Diocesan Catholic Priest of the Diocese of Arlington, VA and a professor of Anthropology at the Catholic University in Washington, DC told us a couple of jokes.  Here is one of his célèbre jokes.  He started asking us, how would you call a person that knows two languages?  One answered, a “double language speaker”.  Father Tadeusz told him, no my dear son, it is something simpler than that.  Another said I know Father is called a bilingual.  Exactly! Said Father Tadeusz.  Then asked us another question, how would you call a person that knows three languages?  I know, Father! The same one answered correctly.  It is called a Trilingual. Very good! Said Father Tadeusz and how would you call a person that knows four languages? Another one present guessing the answer prompted to say, Father is called a quarter-lingual.  OK! said Father Tadeusz, then how would you call a person that knows five languages?  Another one that got the idea said, Father, is a penta-lingual.  Father Tadeusz said that’s fine, it is etymologically correct, but there is a better word, can anyone guess?  Everybody remained silent.  After a few seconds, Father Tadeusz said, a person that knows five or more languages is a poly-phasia-tic (Políglota, in Spanish) or a multi-lingual (polyglot).  Those were though questions, said Father Tadeusz; smiling he continue saying, how you would call a person that only knows one language.  I know Father! (Was the same one that got it wrong the first time).  It is called a uni-lingual. Father said, nope! A one-lingual, Father?  (Same one continued guessing) Father said, nope! A single-lingual, Father?  Father said, maybe, but it sounds weird.  Well Father, how is it called?  For the astonishment of everybody present, Father Tadeusz said, a person that knows only one language is called an American.

Father Tadeusz gave Mass in Fort Belvoir, VA and in Fort Mead, MD is Spanish, in Silver Spring, MD gave two masses one in Russian and one in Polish.  He taught Anthropology undergraduate courses in English at the Cath. Univ. of Wash. DC.  He learned over eight different Amazons Indigenous languages while doing his Master Degree research.  He spent eight years between the countries of Colombia, Venezuela, Ecuador, and Brazil.  He travelled throughout the piranha infected Amazon tributaries.  Many times had no other recourse but to accept riding in a boat with narco-Traficants or guerillas just to be able to move from one place to another in his missionary peregrination spreading the Gospel while at the same time doing Anthropological Research. They would never hurt Padre Tadeo, everybody knew about him, it was an honor and a blessing to give a ride to El Padre.  Some of those Indigenous tribes lived two or three days walking distance apart and there were absolutely no similitude between the languages and the knowledge of other tribes were either vague or not existent, meaning those tribes did not know each other nor had minimum contact. Father Tadeusz was a student of Pope John Paul II while he was getting prepared to become a priest, an Apostle of Jesus Christ.  Father Tadeusz is a multi-lingual, wise and certainly a holy person; he is a human being that knows how to reach other’s hearts because he knows how to communicate in many languages specially the language of Love he irradiates without speaking because it is Divinely Inspired.

Josue, since you live relatively close to Father Tadeusz Mich, please send him my kindly regards and a copy of this article.  I’ve been looking recently in the Internet for him and found the following:

Tadeusz Mich

tmich@worldvision.org

2020 I St. Suite 270

Washington DC 20002

Tadeusz Mich

Church Relations Director, World Vision

 

World Vision Washington D.C.

International Programs Partnership Office

International Recruiting & Media Relations

300 "I" Street NE

Washington, DC 20002

Tel.: (202)572-6300

 

 
In any event, I hope I answered your question.


Sincerely,
Paco Capella

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (12) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

To Gabby

I went back and re-read all posts.  For what is worth, I believe you are a good Christian and I do believe in the candor of your words.  I never accused you or addressed you of hating other religions or whatever.  Without regards to what other sects or Churches believe in, we have to respect others beliefs.  We have to be careful what and how we say things.  Normally when a topic fascinates me and I feel comfortable debating it, I tend to do so by recurring or using to basic principles, concepts and truths.  Since I am convinced (for example) that there is no need to give a different definition to marriage other than the one you could find in any dictionary that is why you perceive me as authoritarian.  When I categorically testify that “whatever” is not an element of the set of traditional views and values, is because that’s a fact you can verify by yourself.  By definition, a Conservative is one that holds and resists changes to traditional views and values.  Therefore, if I say hate is not an element of Conservatism, what are you going to do about this?  You can refute it, or like most people do and say (with due reason) that I am pedant and arrogant.  Even though, I have absolutely no problem in admitting to my pedantry and arrogance, the fact remains that those who accused me of being so, always fail to disproof me.  Their only way to feel wining something in favor of their argumentation is by recurring to ad hominem.  That is counter-productive and always backfires at them.  The ways to deal with crazy people like me is by doing an honest and objective evaluation of the argument and ask if there is any truth or validity in the argument.  Check if argument was made with malice aforethought.   If the truth of the argument is evident and there is no malice, then there is no need for ad hominem.

On the other hand, when I err, I am quick to admit.  Because the quicker you fix an error, the better your life will be.

The Bottom Line is let you and I give each other a fresh start and forgive each other trespasses if there are any. 
Que la Paz de Dios Padre esté con nosotros por la Gracia del Espíritu Santo y esto te lo pedimos por Cristo Nuestro Señor, Amén.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

1 down 11,999,999 to go

Ms. Ann Coulter,

I quoted you in red as show below.

Arellano has already snuck into the country illegally twice (that we know of). After being deported in 1999 -- under an administration that, astonishingly, was more serious about enforcing immigration law than the current one -- she illegally ran across the border again a few days later.

She was first deported on August 1997.  She sneaked back in on or about August 30, 1997.

Despite living in this country illegally for a decade, Arellano hasn't mastered the most rudimentary English. She doesn't want to assimilate and become a "Mexican-American." She wants to be a Mexican-Mexican living in and off America.

If that was 100% true, so what?  Is mastering a language per unit of time a measure of the wants to assimilate? How are you able to conclude she wants to live off America?

So far, the only thing Arellano has contributed to America is one illegitimate child.

Why you say her son is an illegitimate child?  Is this statement a moral opinion of yours?

The Democratic Party is in the fight of its life against a conservative demographic trend. Its only hope is to gerrymander America to make the poorest half of Mexico a state. Only a massive influx of criminals, wards of the state and rioters can save them.

How can the massive influx of criminals, wards of the state and rioters able to vote for the Democratic Party?  How can that be possible?

Listen Ms. Ann Coulter, I am very fond of you 99.999% of the times.  I like and enjoy a lot the sharpness and inquisitiveness of your pen.  Here in this column you twisted the truth.

I do not apologize for illegal aliens, I do not want them residing here illegally either.  I am absolutely convinced that there are sides trying to politically profit from the misfortune of Elvira Arellano.  Let leave this poor women alone.

Let invest all of our anger and frustrations toward finishing the border fence, implementing an ABSOLUTE BORDER control system, punish severely those that lure these poor people to sneak in by employing them for their cheap labor.  Let implement guidelines and procedures that will improve the interface and collaboration between inter-government agencies and law enforcement at local, state and federal level and implement a tamper proof biometric Tax ID for everyone working here.

Yes, 1 down and 11,999,999 more to go, but let go about it humanely and by attacking the roots of the illegal immigration problem instead of stripping off this huge tree leaf-by-leaf of just the few leaves that are reachable (identifiable, i.e., we know who and where they are).  Otherwise, it will take over 12 million years to strip this tree.

Sincerely,
Paco Capella
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (9) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Let set the record straight

Let set the record straight from what I've collected since Nov. 2006.

Elvira Arellano, 32 years old women from Michoacán, Mexico, is certainly an amazing human being.

On August 1997, Elvira entered illegally to the US, was arrested, deported by the US Government, and few days later (on or around August 30, 1997) she illegally re-entered to the US and settles somewhere in Oregon for 3 years.

In 1998, she gave birth to Saul Arellano; her son is by birthplace a US Citizen.  Currently, we do not know much what she did for a living during her 3 years in Oregon, or about Saul’s father.  According to some sources, Saul was born on December 18, 1998 in Toppenish, Washington.  Saul’s unknown father abandoned his mother when she was 3 months pregnant with him.

In 2000, Elvira moved to Chicago, Illinois and made her living as an airplane cabin cleaner at the O’Hare’s International Airport.  She used the social security number belonging to an old woman to get this job.

In 2002, a post 9/11 personnel screening at the airport yield with her arrest, convicted for using a social security number belonging to an 82 years old woman from Milwaukee, Wisconsin in order to obtain her employment, and sentenced to 3 years probation.  Illinois State Laws allowed Elvira to reside legally in the State.  The US Government has allowed her to remain on US soil for short time periods.  The US Government has extended these periods a couple of times upon request of Congress legislators and civil leaders in their hope on pending private legislation pardoning and legalizing her residential status.

On August 15, 2006, Elvira failed to appear before immigration authorities and seek refuge at the Adalberto United Methodist church located at 2716 West Division, Humboldt Park area of Chicago to avoid arrest and deportation.

On November 14, 2006, Elvira’s son, Saul Arellano went to Mexico City to appear before the Congreso de la Unión de los Estados Unidos Mexicanos, that is, the Mexican Congress.  The Mexican lawmakers issued a resolution urging our US Government to halt deportation of Elvira and other Mexican nationals who are parents of US Citizens children.

On May 3, 2007, Rep. Bobby Rush (D-IL) introduced H.R. 2182, which would grant legal immigrant status, with the possibility of applying for permanent residence status, to Arellano as well as to thirty-three other people. Congress referred the bill to the House Committee on the Judiciary and presently has not moved out of committee level.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

At Last! Illegal Migra gone!

Congratulations! To all feeling happy and proud we got rid of an illegal immigrant who crossed twice our borders and who used someone else’s SSN to get a job.

I believe in the rule of law.  I do not approve violations to our laws.  Never the less, I wonder why people keep coming back to our country after being kicked out (deported, if you wish).

What lures them into the US?  Is it our Constitution loophole regarding citizenship?  Is it that getting jobs and a roof is a piece of cake?  Is it that the living conditions abroad are detrimental and ours are panacea?  Is it this is their way of reclaiming previously owned lands?  Is it that their nature incline them to violate and disrespect law and order?  Is it because that is what a corrupt, an arrogant, defiant, thieve and filthy individual do for a living?  Is it they are lazy and impatience thus the reason for avoiding red tape?  Is it all of the above and much more?

OR
, is it that our borders are porous and weak, our laws aren’t enforced, and we don’t have in place a fast ‘n easy tax ID verification, or is it that we have a whole bunch of hypocrites that due to their greed hire them for cheap labor and/or provide a roof to them?

The problem is not the aliens, or their race, or their idiosyncrasy, or their nature.  The problem is US.  Indeed, I meant to say that the immigration problem is in us, actually inside our minds, is our attitude, specifically our hypocrisy.  I also meant to say United States, our country, particularly our country’s security.  In essence, the core of the immigration problem is our lack of absolute border control, “the lure”, law enforcement, and lack of a compulsory biometric Tax ID for everybody.

Let be honest.  I agree Elvira Arellano deportation was very overdue.  We have to agree that she was not supposed to be able to get back into the US in the first place and we have to agree that we were able to found her once again in the US due to an internal security sweep at her workplace.  Therefore, Elvira Arellano is not the problem.  The problem is our broken systems and we.

Allow me to add, that I consider what we did to Elvira Arellano an inhumane atrocity.  We lured her in, took advantage of her, and kicked her butt out.  After she was sentenced and put in 3-year probation, she got support from her community.  Listen very carefully, a community empathized with her and supported her.  Her community premised on the exercise of their wisdom and charity, took the economic burden and the big responsibility of caring for her and her born US citizen son. 

What we do about that?  We accused the community of having a political agenda and of staging a victim’s drama.  Then we start a vilifying campaign against her.  It is ridiculous to believe her Pastor had an agenda and thus staging a drama of whatever reasons we are capable to think of.

The reason why Elvira Arellano came back after being deported and insisted in staying in the US is her illusory belief and conviction that she can have a better life in the United States.  This illusion is insane.  Knowing how we are, I tend to believe these people are brainwashed, hypnotize or masochists.  Because life here is tough, very hard, and the way we treat each other is bad … and the sentiments toward anything alien are even worst.  

What about her “anchor-child”?  Unless we change our Constitution, people born in US jurisdiction are US Citizens.  Therefore, Elvira Arellano’s son, Saul Arellano is a gift from God due to … you name it … I prefer to think due to her humanity or weakness if you prefer.  Because I cannot think of a logical reason why should I get pregnant when my own life is at risk, living in such a hostile environment against me, forced to live in the shadows and in constant fear of being caught at any unexpected moment.  I mean, is overwhelming,  an ordeal, a torture.  If life were hard already, why would I complicate it even more by getting pregnant?  The only way I rationalize this insanity is that the lure or the availability of jobs offered by unscrupulous greedy employers, is very abundant and the immigrant’s illusion of a better life in this paradise is so great that totally outweighs any possibility of making a life in their country of origin.

Our Father who arts in Havens … Can we forgive our trespassers?  Are the crimes committed by illegal immigrant and convicted felon Elvira Arellano so outrageous, therefore not deserving any favorable consideration from our broken government system even in light that there is a little religious community that do sees merits in Elvira’s case?  Are her crimes unpardonable or at least suspend-able?

The Bottom Line is that we have to give ourselves a pad to our backs for successfully kicking Elvira Arellano’s butt back to her country to suffer the consequences of her own actions and decisions and to take this a lesson not only to her but to all of her kind.  That is exactly what we are going to do to the rest of them.  This filth has to respect the sovereignty of our country.

My friends, if you truly believe the above paragraph is sound, then you are as insane as the illegal immigrants who believe they can make a better life in the land of the free and the home of the brave.  Why?  Because the illegal immigration problem is not due because of who they are or come from.  It is due to our lack of absolute border security, the hypocrisy of many greedy opportunists, and the apathy of our government.  Trust me, I do not want to have any more cases like Elvira Arellano’s case, but I have a heart, I am no monster, and what we did to this women was an injustice.  May the Almighty and Creator have mercy on us.

Post Scriptum:  For a sound and patriotic solution to the illegal immigration problem go here: 
Ending the Dishonesty: The Way Forward on Border Control and Patriotic Immigration .

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (15) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »